The high costs of getting ethical and site-specific approvals for multi-centre research
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 17 August 2016
Accepted: 25 October 2016
Published: 7 December 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edward S. Dove|
|2 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stuart Nicholls|
|13 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Adrian Barnett|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edward S. Dove|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Oct 2016||Editorially accepted|
|7 Dec 2016||Article published||10.1186/s41073-016-0023-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.