Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution

  • Charles W. Fox1Email author,
  • Arianne Y. K. Albert2 and
  • Timothy H. Vines3
Research Integrity and Peer Review20172:3

DOI: 10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x

Received: 9 December 2016

Accepted: 4 February 2017

Published: 8 March 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaret Winker
11 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Roberts
2 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Charles Fox
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
4 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s41073-017-0027-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky
(2)
Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre
(3)
Axios Review Editorial Office

Advertisement