Table 2 Ratings (left) and rankings (right) from toy example 2
From: A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank
Proposal | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Judges 1-4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | First | Second | Third | |||||
Judges 5-8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | First | Second | Third | |||||
Judges 9-12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | First | Third | Second | |||||
Judges 13-16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | First | Third | Second | |||||
Mean Rating | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.75 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.75 |