Skip to main content

Table 5 MPRs’, SPRs’ and editors’ decisions

From: Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance

Manuscript Version

MPR decision (n = 25)

SPR decision (n = 30)

Editor decision

Editor agreed with MPR

Editor agreed with SPR

Manuscript 1 R0

Major

Minor

Major

yes

no

Manuscript 1 R1

Minor

Accept

Minor

yes

no

Manuscript 2 R0

 

Major/Major

Major

  

Manuscript 2 R1

Minor

Major/Minor

Minor

  

Manuscript 2 R2

 

Minor

Minor

  

Manuscript 2 R3

 

Minor

Accept

  

Manuscript 3 R0

Major

Accept

Major

yes

no

Manuscript 3 R1

Accept

RR/Minor

Minor

no

yes

Manuscript 3 R2

RR

RR

RR

  

Manuscript 4 R0

Accept/Minor

Minor

Minor

  

Manuscript 4 R1

Accept

Accept

Accept

  

Manuscript 5 R0

Minor

Accept

Minor

yes

no

Manuscript 5 R1

Accept

 

Accept

  

Manuscript 6 R0

Reject

Major

Reject

yes

no

Manuscript 7 R0

Reject

Accept/Minor

Minor

no

yes

Manuscript 7 R1

RR/RR

Accept/Minor

RR

yes

no

Manuscript 8 R0

Minor

 

Minor

  

Manuscript 8 R1

Accept

Major

Minor

no

no

Manuscript 9 R0

Reject

Major/RR

Reject

yes

no

Manuscript 10 R0

Accept

Minor

Minor

no

yes

Manuscript 11 R0

Minor

Accept

Minor

yes

no

Manuscript 12 R0

Major

Major/Minor

Major

  

Manuscript 12 R1

RR

RR

RR

  

Manuscript 13 R0

Major/Major

Major

Major

  

Manuscript 13 R1

Accept

Minor

Accept

yes

no