Skip to content

Advertisement

Research Integrity and Peer Review

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews

Research Integrity and Peer Review20161:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0019-2

Received: 17 June 2016

Accepted: 5 August 2016

Published: 4 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Toby Lasserson
24 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic
1 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Byrne
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
5 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s41073-016-0019-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Children’s Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead
(2)
The University of Sydney Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead

Advertisement