Is it becoming harder to secure reviewers for peer review? A test with data from five ecology journals
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|31 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jason Roberts|
|29 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Arianne Albert|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jason Roberts|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Sep 2016||Editorially accepted|
|4 Nov 2016||Article published||10.1186/s41073-016-0022-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.