This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 25 June 2016
Accepted: 29 October 2016
Published: 21 November 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grace Kissling|
|21 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadia Elia|
|14 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lex Bouter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grace Kissling|
|26 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lex Bouter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Oct 2016||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2016||Article published||10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.