Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Text recycling in health sciences research literature: a rhetorical perspective

Research Integrity and Peer Review20172:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-017-0025-z

Received: 1 July 2016

Accepted: 24 January 2017

Published: 16 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ksenija Bazdaric
27 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Bruton
19 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Cary Moskovitz
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Cary Moskovitz
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Cary Moskovitz
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s41073-017-0025-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Thompson Writing Program, Duke University

Advertisement