‘Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?’: observations on how peer review panels function
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Jul 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|4 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wendy Lipworth|
|1 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - John Coveney|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wendy Lipworth|
|15 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s41073-017-0043-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.