Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jan 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Feb 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mario Malicki|
|6 Mar 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victoria Wong|
|1 May 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara McGillivray|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 May 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mario Malicki|
|28 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victoria Wong|
|29 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara McGillivray|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jul 2018||Editorially accepted|
|17 Aug 2018||Article published||10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.