Skip to main content

Table 2 Forms of peer review categorised by dimension and attributes

From: The changing forms and expectations of peer review

Dimension

Attribute

Range

Selection conditions

Timing

a. No review

b. Pre-submission (including registered reports)

c. Pre-publication

d. Post-publication

e. Mixed methods

Selectiveness

a. Merely access review

b. Non-selective review

c. Selective review

Identities and access

Type of reviewer

a. Editor-in-chief

b. Editorial committee

c. External reviewers selected by authors

d. External reviewers selected by editor(s)

e. Wider community / readers

f. Commercial review platforms

Anonymity of authors

a. Author identities are blinded to editor and reviewer

b. Author identities are blinded to reviewer but known to editor

c. Author identities are known to editor and reviewer

Anonymity of reviewers

a. Anonymous reviewers

b. Reviewers identities are open to the authors

c. Reviewers identities are open to the reader

Availability of review reports

a. Review reports are openly available

b. Review reports are only available to authors, editors and reviewers

Interaction

a. No interaction between authors/reviewers

b. Reviewers only: interaction among reviewers

c. Authors and reviewers: interaction between authors and reviewers

Specialisation in review

Structure

a. Unstructured

b. Semi-structured: Reviewers are guided by some open questions or are presented with several criteria for judgement

c. Structured: Review occurs through mandatory forms or checklists to be filled in by reviewers

Statistical review

a. Not applicable

b. Incorporated in review

c. Performed by additional, specialist reviewer

d. Performed through automatic computer software

Training

a. No specific guidance or training available to/required from reviewers

b. Guide for reviewers available (either online or on paper)

c. Training/courses available for/required from reviewers

d. No specific guidance or training available to/required from reviewers

Technological tools in review

Technical support

a. Review is performed manually

b. Technical assistance in the form of plagiarism check

c. Technical assistance in statistical review

d. Technical assistance in image manipulation

e. Other Technical support (e.g. machine learning techniques to assess consistency and completeness)

Reader commentary

a. No reader commentary facilitated

b. In channel reader commentary facilitated

c. Out of channel reader commentary facilitated