Reported use of reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes, and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Feb 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Apr 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iveta Simera|
|15 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Kathleen Sharp|
|13 Jul 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Jeannine Botos|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Jul 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iveta Simera|
|8 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Melissa Kathleen Sharp|
|9 Aug 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Jeannine Botos|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Aug 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Aug 2018||Editorially accepted|
|27 Sep 2018||Article published||10.1186/s41073-018-0052-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.