Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Reported use of reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes, and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iveta Simera
15 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Kathleen Sharp
13 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jeannine Botos
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iveta Simera
8 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Kathleen Sharp
9 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jeannine Botos
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
30 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
27 Sep 2018 Article published 10.1186/s41073-018-0052-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement