TY - JOUR PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - 2017 R&D trends forecast: results from the Industrial Research Institute’s annual survey JO - Res Technol Manag VL - 60 ID - ref1 ER - TY - STD TI - R. Johnson, A. Watkinson, M. Mabe, The STM Report: an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (2018). ID - ref2 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Rennie, D. PY - 2003 DA - 2003// TI - Editorial peer review: its development and rationale JO - Peer Rev Health Sci VL - 2 ID - Rennie2003 ER - TY - STD TI - C. Neylon, Arenas of productive conflict: Universities, peer review, conflict and knowledge (2018) (available at https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:22483/). UR - https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:22483/ ID - ref4 ER - TY - STD TI - J. P. Tennant, B. Penders, T. Ross-Hellauer, A. Marušić, F. Squazzoni, A. W. Mackay, C. R. Madan, D. M. Shaw, S. Alam, B. Mehmani, Boon, bias or bane? The potential influence of reviewer recommendations on editorial decision-making (2019). ID - ref5 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Moher, D. AU - Galipeau, J. AU - Alam, S. AU - Barbour, V. AU - Bartolomeos, K. AU - Baskin, P. AU - Bell-Syer, S. AU - Cobey, K. D. AU - Chan, L. AU - Clark, J. AU - Deeks, J. AU - Flanagin, A. AU - Garner, P. AU - Glenny, A. -. M. AU - Groves, T. AU - Gurusamy, K. AU - Habibzadeh, F. AU - Jewell-Thomas, S. AU - Kelsall, D. AU - Lapeña, J. F. AU - MacLehose, H. AU - Marusic, A. AU - McKenzie, J. E. AU - Shah, J. AU - Shamseer, L. AU - Straus, S. AU - Tugwell, P. AU - Wager, E. AU - Winker, M. AU - Zhaori, G. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement JO - BMC Med VL - 15 ID - Moher2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Overbeke, J. AU - Wager, E. PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - 3: The state of evidence: what we know and what we don’t know about journal peer review JO - JAMA. VL - 272 ID - Overbeke2011 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Malički, M. AU - Elm, E. AU - Marušić, A. PY - 2014 DA - 2014// TI - Study design, publication outcome, and funding of research presented at International Congresses on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication JO - JAMA. VL - 311 ID - Malički2014 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Dondio, P. AU - Casnici, N. AU - Grimaldo, F. AU - Gilbert, N. AU - Squazzoni, F. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - The “invisible hand” of peer review: the implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal JO - J Inform VL - 13 ID - Dondio2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Grimaldo, F. AU - Marušić, A. AU - Squazzoni, F. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Fragments of peer review: a quantitative analysis of the literature (1969-2015) JO - PLOS ONE. VL - 13 ID - Grimaldo2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Batagelj, V. AU - Ferligoj, A. AU - Squazzoni, F. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review JO - Scientometrics. VL - 113 ID - Batagelj2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ross-Hellauer, T. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - What is open peer review? A systematic review JO - F1000Research VL - 6 ID - Ross-Hellauer2017 ER - TY - STD TI - Allen H, Boxer E, Cury A, Gaston T, Graf C, Hogan B, Loh S, Wakley H, Willis M. What does better peer review look like? Definitions, essential areas, and recommendations for better practice. Open Sci Framework. 2018. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4MFK2. ID - ref13 ER - TY - STD TI - S. Parks, S. Gunashekar, Tracking Global Trends in Open Peer Review (2017; https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/10/tracking-global-trends-in-open-peer-review.html). UR - https://www.rand.org/blog/2017/10/tracking-global-trends-in-open-peer-review.html ID - ref14 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Smith, R. PY - 2006 DA - 2006// TI - Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals JO - J R Soc Med. VL - 99 ID - Smith2006 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Groves, T. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes JO - BMJ VL - 341 ID - Groves2010 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Khan, K. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Is open peer review the fairest system? No JO - BMJ VL - 341 ID - Khan2010 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Smith, R. PY - 1997 DA - 1997// TI - Peer review: reform or revolution? Time to open up the black box of peer review JO - BMJ VL - 315 ID - Smith1997 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Relman, A. S. PY - 1990 DA - 1990// TI - Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it? JO - West J Med. VL - 153 ID - Relman1990 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kassirer, J. P. AU - Campion, E. W. PY - 1994 DA - 1994// TI - Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensable JO - JAMA. VL - 272 ID - Kassirer1994 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Wessely, S. PY - 1996 DA - 1996// TI - What do we know about peer review? JO - Psychol Med VL - 26 ID - Wessely1996 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ross-Hellauer, T. AU - Deppe, A. AU - Schmidt, B. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers JO - PLOS ONE. VL - 12 ID - Ross-Hellauer2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Tennant, J. P. AU - Dugan, J. M. AU - Graziotin, D. AU - Jacques, D. C. AU - Waldner, F. AU - Mietchen, D. AU - Elkhatib, Y. AU - Collister, L. B. AU - Pikas, C. K. AU - Crick, T. AU - Masuzzo, P. AU - Caravaggi, A. AU - Berg, D. R. AU - Niemeyer, K. E. AU - Ross-Hellauer, T. AU - Mannheimer, S. AU - Rigling, L. AU - Katz, D. S. AU - Tzovaras, B. G. AU - Pacheco-Mendoza, J. AU - Fatima, N. AU - Poblet, M. AU - Isaakidis, M. AU - Irawan, D. E. AU - Renaut, S. AU - Madan, C. R. AU - Matthias, L. AU - Kjær, J. N. AU - O’Donnell, D. P. AU - Neylon, C. AU - Kearns, S. AU - Selvaraju, M. AU - Colomb, J. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review JO - F1000Research VL - 6 ID - Tennant2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kaplan, D. PY - 2005 DA - 2005// TI - How to fix peer review: separating its two functions—improving manuscripts and judging their scientific merit—would help JO - J Child Fam Stud. VL - 14 ID - Kaplan2005 ER - TY - STD TI - Hunter J. Post-publication peer review: opening up scientific conversation. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 2012;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063. ID - ref25 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Csiszar, A. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Peer review: troubled from the start JO - Nat News. VL - 532 ID - Csiszar2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Baldwin, M. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Credibility, peer review, and Nature, 1945–1990 JO - Notes Rec. VL - 69 ID - Baldwin2015 ER - TY - STD TI - Moxham N, Fyfe A. The Royal Society And the prehistory of peer review, 1665–1965. Historical J. 2017:1–27. ID - ref28 ER - TY - STD TI - A. Fyfe, K. Coate, S. Curry, S. Lawson, N. Moxham, C. M. Røstvik, Untangling Academic Publishing. A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research., 26 (2017). ID - ref29 ER - TY - STD TI - R. Wijesinha-Bettoni, K. Shankar, A. Marusic, F. Grimaldo, M. Seeber, B. Edmonds, C. Franzoni, F. Squazzoni, Reviewing the review process: new frontiers of peer review. Editorial Board, 82 (2016). ID - ref30 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Squazzoni, F. AU - Brezis, E. AU - Marušić, A. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Scientometrics of peer review JO - Scientometrics. VL - 113 ID - Squazzoni2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Munafò, M. R. AU - Nosek, B. A. AU - Bishop, D. V. M. AU - Button, K. S. AU - Chambers, C. D. AU - Sert, N. P. AU - Simonsohn, U. AU - Wagenmakers, E. -. J. AU - Ware, J. J. AU - Ioannidis, J. P. A. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - A manifesto for reproducible science JO - Nat Human Behav VL - 1 ID - Munafò2017 ER - TY - JOUR PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science JO - Science VL - 349 ID - ref33 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Crick, T. AU - Hall, B. AU - Ishtiaq, S. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Reproducibility in research: systems, infrastructure, culture JO - J Open Res Software. VL - 5 ID - Crick2017 ER - TY - STD TI - ter Riet G, Storosum BWC, Zwinderman AH. What is reproducibility? F1000Res. 8:36, 2019. ID - ref35 ER - TY - STD TI - L. A. Barba, Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv:1802.03311 [cs] (2018) (available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311). UR - http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311 ID - ref36 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Bravo, G. AU - Grimaldo, F. AU - López-Iñesta, E. AU - Mehmani, B. AU - Squazzoni, F. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals JO - Nat Commun VL - 10 ID - Bravo2019 ER - TY - STD TI - Squazzoni F, Grimaldo F, Marušić A. Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data. Nature. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/546352a. ID - ref38 ER - TY - STD TI - S. Pranić, B. Mehmani, S. Marušić, M. Malički, A. Marušić, in New Frontiers of Peer Review (PEERE), European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) (2017). ID - ref39 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Allen, H. AU - Cury, A. AU - Gaston, T. AU - Graf, C. AU - Wakley, H. AU - Willis, M. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - What does better peer review look like? Underlying principles and recommendations for better practice JO - Learned Publishing VL - 32 ID - Allen2019 ER - TY - STD TI - J. C. Bailar III, K. Patterson, Journal peer review: the need for a research agenda (Mass Medical Soc, 1985). ID - ref41 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Lee, C. J. AU - Moher, D. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data JO - Science. VL - 357 ID - Lee2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Rooyen, S. AU - Delamothe, T. AU - Evans, S. J. W. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial JO - BMJ. VL - 341 ID - Rooyen2010 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Polka, J. K. AU - Kiley, R. AU - Konforti, B. AU - Stern, B. AU - Vale, R. D. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Publish peer reviews JO - Nature. VL - 560 ID - Polka2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Hope, A. A. AU - Munro, C. L. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Criticism and judgment: a critical look at scientific peer review JO - Am J Crit Care. VL - 28 ID - Hope2019 ER - TY - STD TI - B.-C. Bjórk, Acceptance rates of scholarly peer-reviewed journals: a literature survey. El Profesional de la Información. 28 (2019), doi:10/gf6zzk. ID - ref46 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Sugimoto, C. R. AU - Larivière, V. AU - Ni, C. AU - Cronin, B. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - Journal acceptance rates: a cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures JO - J Inform VL - 7 ID - Sugimoto2013 ER - TY - STD TI - Khosravi MR. Reliability of scholarly journal acceptance rates. Library Hi Tech News. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-07-2018-0044. ID - ref48 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Charles, W. AU - Fox, A. Y. K. AU - Albert, T. H. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Vines, Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution JO - Res Integrity Peer Rev VL - 2 ID - Charles2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Gropp, R. E. AU - Glisson, S. AU - Gallo, S. AU - Thompson, L. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Peer review: a system under stress JO - BioScience. VL - 67 ID - Gropp2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kovanis, M. AU - Trinquart, L. AU - Ravaud, P. AU - Porcher, R. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication JO - Scientometrics. VL - 113 ID - Kovanis2017 ER - TY - STD TI - Heesen R, Romeijn J-W. Epistemic diversity and editor decisions: a statistical Matthew effect. Philosophers’ Imprint. 2019. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16262/. UR - http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16262/ ID - ref52 ER - TY - STD TI - Hofmeister R, Krapf M. How do editors select papers, and how good are they at doing it? B.E. J Econ Analysis Policy. 2011;11. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.3022. ID - ref53 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Morgan, A. C. AU - Economou, D. J. AU - Way, S. F. AU - Clauset, A. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - Prestige drives epistemic inequality in the diffusion of scientific ideas JO - EPJ Data Sci. VL - 7 ID - Morgan2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Dal-Ré, R. AU - Caplan, A. L. AU - Marusic, A. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Editors’ and authors’ individual conflicts of interest disclosure and journal transparency. A cross-sectional study of high-impact medical specialty journals JO - BMJ Open VL - 9 ID - Dal-Ré2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Teixeira da Silva, J. A. AU - Dobránszki, J. AU - Bhar, R. H. AU - Mehlman, C. T. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Editors should declare conflicts of interest JO - Bioethical Inquiry. VL - 16 ID - Teixeira da Silva2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Huisman, J. AU - Smits, J. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective JO - Scientometrics. VL - 113 ID - Huisman2017 ER - TY - STD TI - A. Marusic, 10 The role of the peer review process. Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, 128 (2019). ID - ref58 ER - TY - STD TI - N. van Sambeek, D. Lakens, “Reviewers’ decision to sign reviews is related to their recommendation” (preprint, PsyArXiv, 2019), , doi:https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4va6p. ID - ref59 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Bornmann, L. AU - Mutz, R. AU - Daniel, H. -. D. PY - 2010 DA - 2010// TI - A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: a multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants JO - PLOS ONE. VL - 5 ID - Bornmann2010 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Campos-Arceiz, A. AU - Primack, R. B. AU - Koh, L. P. PY - 2015 DA - 2015// TI - Reviewer recommendations and editors’ decisions for a conservation journal: is it just a crapshoot? And do Chinese authors get a fair shot? JO - Biol Conservation. VL - 186 ID - Campos-Arceiz2015 ER - TY - STD TI - Tennant JP, Penders B, Ross-Hellauer T, Marušić A, Squazzoni F, Mackay AW, Madan CR, Shaw DM, Alam S, Mehmani B, Graziotin D, Nicholas D. Boon, bias or bane? The potential influence of reviewer recommendations on editorial decision-making. Eur Sci Editing. 2019;45. https://doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2019.45.18013. ID - ref62 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Lee, C. J. AU - Sugimoto, C. R. AU - Zhang, G. AU - Cronin, B. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - Bias in peer review JO - J Assoc Inform Sci Technol VL - 64 ID - Lee2013 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Tennant, J. P. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - The dark side of peer review JO - Editorial Office News. VL - 10 ID - Tennant2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Sandström, U. AU - Hällsten, M. PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - Persistent nepotism in peer-review JO - Scientometrics. VL - 74 ID - Sandström2008 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Teplitskiy, M. AU - Acuna, D. AU - Elamrani-Raoult, A. AU - Körding, K. AU - Evans, J. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - The sociology of scientific validity: how professional networks shape judgement in peer review JO - Res Policy. VL - 47 ID - Teplitskiy2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Glonti, K. AU - Cauchi, D. AU - Cobo, E. AU - Boutron, I. AU - Moher, D. AU - Hren, D. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals JO - BMJ Open. VL - 7 ID - Glonti2017 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Glonti, K. AU - Cauchi, D. AU - Cobo, E. AU - Boutron, I. AU - Moher, D. AU - Hren, D. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals JO - BMC Med VL - 17 ID - Glonti2019 ER - TY - STD TI - M. Dahrendorf, T. Hoffmann, M. Mittenbühler, S.-M. Wiechert, A. Sarafoglou, D. Matzke, E.-J. Wagenmakers, “Because it is the right thing to do”: taking stock of the Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative” (preprint, PsyArXiv, 2019), , doi:https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h39jt. ID - ref69 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Tomkins, A. AU - Zhang, M. AU - Heavlin, W. D. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review JO - Proc Natl Acad Sci VL - 114 ID - Tomkins2017 ER - TY - STD TI - H. Bastian, The Fractured Logic of Blinded Peer Review in Journals (2017; http://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-maybe/2017/10/31/the-fractured-logic-of-blinded-peer-review-in-journals/). UR - http://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-maybe/2017/10/31/the-fractured-logic-of-blinded-peer-review-in-journals/ ID - ref71 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Lundine, J. AU - Bourgeault, I. L. AU - Glonti, K. AU - Hutchinson, E. AU - Balabanova, D. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - “I don’t see gender”: conceptualizing a gendered system of academic publishing JO - Soc Sci Med VL - 235 ID - Lundine2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Lynam, D. R. AU - Hyatt, C. S. AU - Hopwood, C. J. AU - Wright, A. G. C. AU - Miller, J. D. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Should psychologists sign their reviews? Some thoughts and some data JO - J Abnormal Psychol VL - 128 ID - Lynam2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Baggs, J. G. AU - Broome, M. E. AU - Dougherty, M. C. AU - Freda, M. C. AU - Kearney, M. H. PY - 2008 DA - 2008// TI - Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals JO - J Advanced Nurs VL - 64 ID - Baggs2008 ER - TY - STD TI - J. Tóth, Blind myself: simple steps for rditors and software providers to take against affiliation bias. Sci Eng Ethics (2019), doi:10/gf6zzj. ID - ref75 ER - TY - STD TI - Tennant JP. The state of the art in peer review. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018;365. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny204. ID - ref76 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Rooyen, S. AU - Godlee, F. AU - Evans, S. AU - Black, N. AU - Smith, R. PY - 1999 DA - 1999// TI - Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’recommendations: a randomised trial JO - BMJ. VL - 318 ID - Rooyen1999 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Justice, A. C. AU - Cho, M. K. AU - Winker, M. A. AU - Berlin, J. A. AU - Rennie, D. PY - 1998 DA - 1998// TI - Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators JO - JAMA VL - 280 ID - Justice1998 ER - TY - JOUR AU - McNutt, R. A. AU - Evans, A. T. AU - Fletcher, R. H. AU - Fletcher, S. W. PY - 1990 DA - 1990// TI - The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial JO - JAMA VL - 263 ID - McNutt1990 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Okike, K. AU - Hug, K. T. AU - Kocher, M. S. AU - Leopold, S. S. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Single-blind vs double-blind peer review in the setting of author prestige JO - JAMA. VL - 316 ID - Okike2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Godlee, F. AU - Gale, C. R. AU - Martyn, C. N. PY - 1998 DA - 1998// TI - Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial JO - JAMA. VL - 280 ID - Godlee1998 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Bianchi, F. AU - Grimaldo, F. AU - Squazzoni, F. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - The F3-index. Valuing reviewers for scholarly journals JO - J Informetrics VL - 13 ID - Bianchi2019 ER - TY - STD TI - Cowley SJ. How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector. Front. Psychol. 2015;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01706. ID - ref83 ER - TY - STD TI - J. P. Alperin, C. M. Nieves, L. Schimanski, G. E. Fischman, M. T. Niles, E. C. McKiernan, How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion, and tenure documents? (2018) (available at https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:21015/). UR - https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:21015/ ID - ref84 ER - TY - STD TI - Priem J, Hemminger BM. Decoupling the scholarly journal. Front Comput Neurosci. 2012;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00019. ID - ref85 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ghosh, S. S. AU - Klein, A. AU - Avants, B. AU - Millman, K. J. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Learning from open source software projects to improve scientific review JO - Front Comput Neurosci. VL - 6 ID - Ghosh2012 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Horbach, S. P. J. M. AU - Halffman, W. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications JO - Scientometrics. VL - 118 ID - Horbach2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Superchi, C. AU - González, J. A. AU - Solà, I. AU - Cobo, E. AU - Hren, D. AU - Boutron, I. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review JO - BMC Med Res Methodology VL - 19 ID - Superchi2019 ER - TY - STD TI - E. Adie, Commenting on scientific articles (PLoS edition) (2009), (available at http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/2009/02/commenting_on_scientific_artic.html). UR - http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/2009/02/commenting_on_scientific_artic.html ID - ref89 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ginsparg, P. PY - 2011 DA - 2011// TI - ArXiv at 20 JO - Nature. VL - 476 ID - Ginsparg2011 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Morey, R. D. AU - Chambers, C. D. AU - Etchells, P. J. AU - Harris, C. R. AU - Hoekstra, R. AU - Lakens, D. AU - Lewandowsky, S. AU - Morey, C. C. AU - Newman, D. P. AU - Schönbrodt, F. D. AU - Vanpaemel, W. AU - Wagenmakers, E. -. J. AU - Zwaan, R. A. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review JO - Royal Soc Open Sci VL - 3 ID - Morey2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Fanelli, D. PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic teview and meta-analysis of survey data JO - PLOS ONE VL - 4 ID - Fanelli2009 ER - TY - STD TI - E. C. McKiernan, L. A. Schimanski, C. M. Nieves, L. Matthias, M. T. Niles, J. P. Alperin, “Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations” (e27638v2, PeerJ Inc., 2019), , doi:https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27638v2. ID - ref93 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Schimanski, L. A. AU - Alperin, J. P. PY - 2018 DA - 2018// TI - The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future JO - F1000Res VL - 7 ID - Schimanski2018 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Keserlioglu, K. AU - Kilicoglu, H. AU - Riet, G. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after study JO - Res Integrity Peer Rev VL - 4 ID - Keserlioglu2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Danchev, V. AU - Rzhetsky, A. AU - Evans, J. A. PY - 2019 DA - 2019// TI - Centralized scientific communities are less likely to generate replicable results JO - eLife. VL - 8 ID - Danchev2019 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Kumar, M. PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - A review of the review process: manuscript peer-review in biomedical research JO - Biol Med VL - 1 ID - Kumar2009 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Campanario, J. M. PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - Rejecting and resisting Nobel class discoveries: accounts by Nobel Laureates JO - Scientometrics. VL - 81 ID - Campanario2009 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Neylon, C. AU - Pattinson, D. AU - Bilder, G. AU - Lin, J. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - On the origin of nonequivalent states: How we can talk about preprints JO - F1000Res VL - 6 ID - Neylon2017 ER - TY - STD TI - E. Adie, Who comments on scientific papers – and why? (2008), (available at http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/2008/07/who_leaves_comments_on_scienti_1.html). UR - http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/2008/07/who_leaves_comments_on_scienti_1.html ID - ref100 ER - TY - STD TI - Ginsparg P. Preprint Déjà Vu. EMBO J. 2016:e201695531. ID - ref101 ER - TY - STD TI - A. Gentil-Beccot, S. Mele, T. Brooks, Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics. How a community stopped worrying about journals and learned to love repositories. arXiv:0906.5418 [cs] (2009) (available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.5418). UR - http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.5418 ID - ref102 ER - TY - STD TI - Carneiro CFD, Queiroz VGS, Moulin TC, Carvalho CAM, Haas CB, Rayêe D, Henshall DE, De-Souza EA, Espinelli F, Boos FZ, Guercio GD, Costa IR, Hajdu KL, Modrák M, Tan PB, Burgess SJ, Guerra SFS, Bortoluzzi VT, Amaral OB. Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature. bioRxiv. 2019:581892. ID - ref103 ER - TY - STD TI - Tennant JP, Bauin S, James S, Kant J. The evolving preprint landscape: Introductory report for the Knowledge Exchange working group on preprints. BITSS. 2018. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/796TU. ID - ref104 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Marra, M. PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Astrophysicists and physicists as creators of ArXiv-based commenting resources for their research communities. An initial survey JO - Inform Services Use VL - 37 ID - Marra2017 ER - TY - STD TI - S. Hindle, Saderi, PREreview — a new resource for the collaborative review of preprints (2017; https://elifesciences.org/labs/57d6b284/prereview-a-new-resource-for-the-collaborative-review-of-preprints). UR - https://elifesciences.org/labs/57d6b284/prereview-a-new-resource-for-the-collaborative-review-of-preprints ID - ref106 ER - TY - STD TI - T. Ross-Hellauer, B. Schmidt, B. Kramer, “Are funder Open Access platforms a good idea?” (PeerJ Inc., 2018), , doi:https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26954v1. ID - ref107 ER - TY - STD TI - Moore SA. A genealogy of open access: negotiations between openness and access to research. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.3220. ID - ref108 ER - TY - STD TI - R. I. Network, Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK: Report commissioned by the Research Information Network (RIN) (2008). ID - ref109 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Stemmle, L. AU - Collier, K. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - RUBRIQ: tools, services, and software to improve peer review JO - Learned Publishing VL - 26 ID - Stemmle2013 ER - TY - STD TI - V. Demicheli, C. Di Pietrantonj, Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, MR000003 (2007). ID - ref111 ER - TY - STD TI - T. Jefferson, M. Rudin, S. Brodney Folse, F. Davidoff, Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, MR000016 (2007). ID - ref112 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Rennie, D. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Let’s make peer review scientific JO - Nat News VL - 535 ID - Rennie2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Squazzoni, F. AU - Ahrweiler, P. AU - Barros, T. PY - 2020 DA - 2020// TI - Unlock ways to share data on peer review JO - Nature VL - 578 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00500-y DO - 10.1038/d41586-020-00500-y ID - Squazzoni2020 ER - TY - STD TI - Ioannidis JPA, Berkwits M, Flanagin A, Godlee F, Bloom T. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research. BMJ. 2019;366. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5475. ID - ref115 ER -