Skip to main content

Table 2 Reporting scores by questionnaire section. Independent sample comparison p values are from Student’s t-tests, while paired samples’ ones are from paired t-tests. In the paired sample there were 32 preprints and 35 peer-reviewed articles with no applicable questions in the Drugs and Reagents section; thus, there were only 17 pairs available for the statistical comparison. 2-way ANOVA results are presented in individual lines below each comparison set. All values are presented as mean ± S.D. 95% C.I.; 95% confidence interval of the difference

From: Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

Study stage

Subset

# of applicable questions

Score (preprints)

Score (peer-reviewed)

Difference [95% C.I.]

pvalue

Sample size

Independent samples

Title and abstract

1 ± 0

84.2 ± 36.7

93.4 ± 25.0

9.2 [−0.8, 19.3]

0.07

76

Risk of bias

3.7 ± 0.5

39.3 ± 23.6

39.9 ± 20.2

0.6 [−6.4, 7.6]

0.87

76

Drugs and reagents

1.2 ± 1.4

62.2 ± 36.0

78.5 ± 29.2

16.3 [0.6, 31.9]

0.04

31 (bioRxiv), 38 (PubMed)

Data presentation

7.3 ± 0.9

75.1 ± 16.9

79.9 ± 12.7

4.8 [−0.02, 9.6]

0.05

76

Data analysis

6 ± 0

83.6 ± 20.4

81.0 ± 19.4

−2.6 [−8.9, 3.9]

0.44

76

Group: F = 5.53, df = 1, p = 0.02; Section: F = 97.09, df = 4, p < 2 × 10−16; Interaction: F = 2.46, df = 4, p = 0.04

Paired sample

Title and abstract

1 ± 0

85.7 ± 35.3

83.9 ± 37.1

1.8 [−8.0, 4.4]

0.57

56

Risk of bias

3.7 ± 0.5

39.7 ± 20.6

54.2 ± 17.4

14.6 [8.4, 20.8]

1.6 × 10−5

56

Drugs and reagents

0.9 ± 1.3

66.4 ± 35.7

81.6 ± 26.8

15.2 [4.0, 26.4]

0.01

17

Data presentation

7.3 ± 0.8

78.4 ± 12.5

80.9 ± 13.3

2.5 [−0.3, 5.4]

0.08

56

Data analysis

6 ± 0

84.5 ± 16.2

88.1 ± 14.2

3.6 [−0.5, 7.6]

0.08

56

Group: F = 6.31, df = 1, p = 0.01; Section: F = 50.37, df = 4, p < 2 × 10−16; Interaction: F = 2.00, df = 4, p = 0.09