Skip to main content

Table 1 Coding of comments obtained from social media

From: Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review

  Total Facebook Twitter Blogs Reddit
Comment Received N=96 N=18 N=64 N=8 N=6
Positive Comments
 Praise of study 57 (59%) 6 (30%) 45 (70%) 1 (13%) 5 (83%)
 Sharing personal experience 15 (16%) 1 (5%) 14 (22%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Neegative Comments
 Unsubstantiated critique of study methodology 6 (6%) 0 (0%) 2 (3%) 4 (50%) 0 (0%)
 Forced niceness will weaken peer-review 5 (5%) 2 (10%) 2 (3%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%)
 Difficulty adopting perspective of others 6 (6%) 3 (15%) 2 (3%) 1 (13%) 0 (0%)
 Authors brought unprofessional comments upon themselves by submitting substandard work 5 (5%) 4 (22%) 1 (1%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Not of relevance 2 (2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (13%) 1 (17%)
Sharing over Social Media Total Facebook Twitter Blogs Reddit
 Tweets / Retweets / Shared without comments 221 5 215 1 0
  1. Note. Some feedback sources contained more than one category of reviewer feedback, resulting in some columns which total more than 100%