Characteristics | N (%) |
---|---|
Accepted version of DFRR (N = 64) | |
1st revision | 20 (31%) |
2nd revision | 31 (48%) |
3rd revision | 11 (17%) |
4th revision | 2 (3%) |
Did the reviewers comment about spin in the DFRR? (N = 64) | |
Yes | 55 (86%) |
No | 9 (14%) |
Did the project have one or more journal articles accepted or published before receiving PCORI peer review feedback? (N = 64)a | |
Yes | 58 (90%) |
No | 5 (8%) |
Can’t tell | 1 (2%) |
In DFRRs with spin, which type of spin was identified? (N = 55) | |
Reporting bias | 46 (84%) |
Inappropriate interpretation | 40 (73%) |
Attribution of causality | 5 (9%) |
Inappropriate extrapolation of results | 15 (27%) |
Among DFRRs with spin identified, were comments about spin addressed in last version of the DFRR? (N = 55) | |
Yes, the authors changed the DFRR to address this issue | 38 (69%) |
Yes, the authors provided a satisfactory response explaining why a change is not requiredb | 9 (16%) |
No | 8 (15%) |
Can’t tell | 0 (0%) |
Of the DFRRs in which spin was identified, did at least one article include the spin identified in the DFRR? (N = 55) | |
Yes, one or more articles included spin | 21 (38%) |
No, none of the articles included spin | 13 (24%) |
Not applicable, none of the associated articles reported results related to comments about spin | 21 (38%) |
Can’t tell | 0 (0%) |