Peer Review reports
From: What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Feb 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Mar 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Alejandra Recio-Saucedo |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 9 Mar 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 31 Mar 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan-Ole Hesselberg |
| 18 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noah Haber |
| 19 Apr 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ismail Saglam |
| 19 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Wietens |
| 10 Sep 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Alejandra Recio-Saucedo |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Sep 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Nov 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Alejandra Recio-Saucedo |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Nov 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Jan 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Alejandra Recio-Saucedo |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Feb 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Mar 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s41073-022-00120-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.