Peer Review reports
From: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 May 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 11 Jul 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Danielle Rice |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Jul 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Jul 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Travis Gerwing |
| 4 Aug 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Flaminio Squazzoni |
| 14 Nov 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Danielle Rice |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Nov 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Jan 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Danielle Rice |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 3 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Danielle Rice |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Feb 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Feb 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.