Skip to main content

Table 1 Questions to assess how strongly university codes of research conduct (1) defined research integrity, quality and misconduct, (2) required ethics approval, (3) endorsed 9 responsible research practices and (4) discouraged 5 research misbehaviours and questionable research practices. Variable names used in Fig.Ā 1 are in italics

From: Responsible research practices could be more strongly endorsed by Australian university codes of research conduct

Definitions.

Does the code define:

ā€ƒ'research integrity'?

research integrity

ā€ƒ'research quality'?

research quality

ā€ƒ'research misconduct'?

research misconduct

Ethics approval.

Does the code state that:

ā€ƒall research on humans must be approved by an appropriate ethics committee?

NA

ā€ƒall research on animals must be approved by an appropriate ethics committee?

NA

Responsible research practices.

Does the code state that:

ā€ƒstudy protocols of clinical trials should be publicly registered?

register trial protocol

ā€ƒstudy protocols of other study designs should be publicly registered?

register other protocol

ā€ƒanalysis protocols should be publicly registered?

register analysis protocol

ā€ƒstudy data should be made publicly available?

open data

ā€ƒanalysis code should be made publicly available?

open code

ā€ƒfindings should be published on open access platforms?

open publishing

ā€ƒreporting guidelines (e.g. from journals, professional associations, or the EQUATOR network) should be used in reporting research?

reporting guidelines

ā€ƒconflicts of interest should be declared?

conflicts of interest

ā€ƒresearchers should receive training in research integrity and other areas (e.g. research supervision, data management, peer review, publishing 'negative' findings)?

researcher training

Research misbehaviours and questionable research practices.

Does the code state that:

ā€ƒfabricating data should be discouraged?

fabricate data

ā€ƒselectively deleting or modifying data after performing initial data analysis should be discouraged?

select data

ā€ƒselectively reporting results (e.g. not publishing a valid 'negative' finding) should be discouraged?

select results

ā€ƒperforming analyses until statistically significant results are obtained (i.e. p should be discouraged?

p-hacking

ā€ƒhypothesizing after results are known should be discouraged?

harking