van der Zee T, Anaya J, Brown NJ. Statistical heartburn: an attempt to digest four pizza publications from the Cornell food and brand lab. BMC Nutr. 2017;3(54):1–15.
Munafò MR, Hollands GJ, Marteau T. Open science prevents mindless science. BMJ. 2018;363(k4309):1–2.
Kroeger CM, Garza C, Lynch CJ, Myers E, Rowe S, Schneeman BO, Sharma AM, Allison DB. Scientific rigor and credibility in the nutrition research landscape. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107(3):484–94.
Brown AW, Altman DG, Baronowski T, Bland JM, Dawson JA, Dhurandhar NV, Dowla S, Fontaine KR, Gelman A, Heymfield SB, et al. Childhood obesity intervention studies: a narrative review and guide for investigators, authors, editors, reviewers, journalists, and readers to guard against exaggerated effectiveness claims. Obes Rev. 2019;20(11):1523–41.
Mandrioli D, Kearns CE, Bero LA. Relationship between research outcomes and risk of bias, study sponsorship, and author financial conflicts of interest in reviews of the effects of artificially sweetened beverages on weight outcomes: a systematic review of reviews. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162198.
Fabbri A, Lai A, Grundy Q, Bero LA. The influence of industry sponsorship on the research agenda: a scoping review. Am J Public. 2018;108(11):e9–e16.
Chartres N, Fabbri A, Bero LA. Association of industry sponsorship with outcomes of nutrition studies: a systematic seview and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(12):1769–77.
Bero LA, Norris SL, Lawrence MA. Making nutrition guidelines fit for purpose. BMJ. 2019;365:l1579.
Ioannidis JPA. The challenge of reforming nutritional epidemiologic research. JAMA. 2018;320(10):969–70.
Schoenfeld JD, Ioannidis JPA. Is everything we eat associated with cancer? A systematic cookbook review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:127–34.
Nuzzo R. Fooling ourselves. Nature. 2015;526:182–5.
Shrout PE, Rodgers JL. Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018;69:487–510.
Wagenmakers E-J, Wetzels R, Brsboom D, van der Maas HLJ, Kievit RA. An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:632–8.
Miguel E, Camerer C, Casey K, Cohen J, Esterling KM, Gerbe A, et al. Promoting transparency in social science research. Science. 2014;343:30–1.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals 2018. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Cited 19 Nov 2019.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2010;7(3):e1000251.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.
Meerpohl JJ, Wolff RF, Niemeyer CM, Antes G, von Elm E. Editorial policies for pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(3):268–72.
Meerpohl JJ, Wolff RF, Antes G, von Elm E. Are pediatric open Acess journals promoting good publication practice: an analysis of author instructions. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11(27):1–7.
Smith TA, Kulatilake P, Brown LJ, Wigley J, Hameed W, Shantikumar S. Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of ‘instructions to authors.’. Ann Med Surg. 2015;4(1):17–21.
Sims ST, Henning NM, Wayant CC, Vassar M. Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors”. Scan J Truma, Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):137.
Checketts JX, Sims MT, Detweiler B, Middlemist K, Jones J, Vassar M. An evaluation of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registry requirements among orthopaedic surgery journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(3):e15.
Gorman DM. Use of publication procedures to improve research integrity by addiction journals. Addiction. 2019;114(8):1478–86.
Clarivate Analytics. 2018 Journal citation reports 2018. Available from: https://clarivatecom/webofsciencegroup/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/10/Crv_JCR_Full-Marketing-List_A4_2018_v4pdf Cited 29 Jan 2020.
Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. The Journal Impact Factor: A brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects. In: Glänzel W, Moed HF, Schmoch U, Thelwall M, editors. Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators, vol. 2018. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 3–24.
Scimago Journal & County Rank. 2019. Available from: https://www.scimagojr.com.
Center for Open Science. Registered Reports: Peer review before results are known to align scientific values and practices. Available from: https://cos.io/rr/. Cited 19 Dec 2019.
EQUATOR Network. Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research 2019. Available from: https://www.equator-network.org. Cited 19 Dec 2019.
FAIRsharing.org. Standards, databases, policies 2020. Available from: https://fairsharing.org/policies/. Cited 8 Jan 2020.
U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Cited 2 Jan 2020.
National Institute for Health Research. PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/. Cited 2 Jan 2020.
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.
Ioannidis JPA, Munafò MR, Fusar-Poli P, Nosek BA, David SP. Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence and prevention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18(5):235–41.
Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SD, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015;348(6242):1422–5.
Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop D, Button KS, Chambers CD, Sert NP, Simonsohn U, Wagenmakers E-J, Ware JJ, Ioannidis JPA. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:1–9.
Galea S. A typology of nonfinancial conflict in population health research. Am J Publ Hlth. 2018;108:631–2.
Bero LA, Grundy Q. Why having a (nonfinancial) interest is not a conflict of interest. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(12):e2001221.
Ioannidis JPA. Scientific inbreeding and same-team replication: type D personality as an example. J Psychosom Res. 2012;73:408–10.
Wansink B. Mindless eating: why we eat more than we think. New York: Bantam Books; 2006.
Nosek BA, Ebersole CR, DeHaven AC, Mellor DT. The preregistration revolution. PNAS. 2018;115:2600–6.
Harriman SL, Patel J. When are clinical trial registered? An analysis of prospective versus retrospective registration. Trials. 2016;17:187.
Hunter KE, Seidler AL, Askie LM. Prospective registration trends, reasons for retrospective registration and mechanisms to increase prospective registration compliance: descriptive analysis and survey. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019983.
van Lent M, IntHout J, Out H. J. Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:1059–67.
Rankin J, Ross A, Baker J, O’Brien M, Scheckel C, Vassar M. Selective outcome reporting in obesity clinical trials: a cross-sectional review. Clin Ob. 2017;7:245–54.
Smith SM, Dworkin RH. Prospective clinical trial registration: not sufficient, but always necessary. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(5):538–41.
Page MJ, Moher D. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and extensions: a scoping review. Systemat Revs. 2017;6:263.
Li G, Bhatt M, Wang M, Mbuagbaw L, Samaan Z, Thabane L. Enhancing primary reports of randomized controlled trials: three most common challenges and suggested solutions. PNAS. 2018;115:2595–9.
Pouwels KB, Widyakusuma NN, Groenwold RHH, Hak E. Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:217–24.
Wallach JD, Boyack KW, Ioannidis JPA. Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(11):e2006930.
Vidal-Infer A, Aleixandre-Benavent R, Lucas-Dominguez R, Sixto-Costoya A. The availability of raw data in substance abuse scientific journals. J Subst Use. 2019;24:36–40.
Walters C, Harter ZJ, Wayant C, Vo N, Warren M, Chronister J, Tritz D, Vassar M. Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e033962.
Gorman DM. Availability of research data in high-impact addiction journals with a data sharing policy. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020;26:1625–32.
Ioannidis JPA. How to make more published research true. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10):1001747.
National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2019.